Libert� Ch�rie
Libert� Ch�rie
Action ! Idées Medias
Ireland used to be a poor country.
Rechercher :
Recherche avancée
La f�d�rationMon comit�Tous les comit�sMon compteForum

EU expansion gives firms more options, weakening labor

An Interview with Sabine Herold on Politics, France, and Freedom

The aftermath of the French "no" to the European Constitution

The No Vote Was So Typically French

Article about Liberté Chérie in the Brussels Journal

Sabine, Herald of Liberty

In search of European democracy

The European constitution contains some good sense. That's why the French dislike it.

Jacques in charge - article paru dans le Wall Street Journal

'The EU was France's baby. We can't throw her out now'

A young pro-capitalist heroine shows that not all Europeans oppose economic liberty

Sarkozy Mounts Showdown against the Unions

Liberté, liberté chérie
par Sabine Herold Edouard Fillias Présentation de l'éditeur: 15 juin 2003 : plus de cent mille pers...

Manuel des réformateurs de terrain
par Dominique Garrigues 4ème de couverture: "Quel sera l'enjeu des échéances politiques de 2007, pr...

Envoyer à un ami
Imprimer

Ireland used to be a poor country.

par Jean-Pierre Chevallier, le 14/01/06

Traduit par Roslyn Young

Ireland used to be a poor country : it has no natural riches. The land is full of water. The only things which manage to grow are grass (for livestock farming) , rye (for making whiskey !) and potatoes, which were badly affected by potato blight in the XIX century, causing half the 8 million Irish people to disappear : those who didn’t die of hunger emigrated. Ireland now has 6 million people, but 70 million people of Irish origin live outside the country of their ancestors, mostly in North America. In 1985, the standard of living in Ireland was the second lowest of the European Union : twenty years later it is now the second highest after the micro-state of Luxembourg. Was this the result of a miracle? No : the Irish applied liberalism with intelligence, and it works!

The increase in GDP took off in 1985 : an average of 5.6% per year thanks to a very liberal economic policy put into place by the small Liberal Party (The Progressive Democrats) which was created at that time. The party has only 6 members of Parliament (out of 166) but has managed to convince it ally, the majority conservative Party (Fiana Fail) to lower the weight of the state. The lowering of tax and social security contributions on work provided the initial impulse : they were lowered from 37% in 1985 to 19% in 2004, which means the Irish keep 80% of what they earn at work. In this way, they are encouraged to work more. By comparison, comparable tax and social security contributions on French workers make up more than 50% (taking into account social security payments, employers’ social security contributions and taxes)   with respect to the total cost to the employer, which is the real salary, that is, the counterpart to the work provided.

The Irish spend their money by consuming... relatively little, as taxes are high. With VAT at 21%, and supplementary taxes on petrol, cars, alcohol, etc, they are encouraged strongly to invest in construction, thanks to fiscal advantages and to very low interest rates (since the ECB is keeping interest rates very low in order to stimulate growth in Old Continental Europe).  The result is that houses are generally big and recent, and condominiums are going up all over Dublin. When the building industry is prosperous, everyone is prosperous! The boosting of construction always gives excellent results, as was shown by the United States since 2002 and France .... during the 60s. Construction of homes is proportionally 15 times greater in Ireland than in the United Kingdom.

As well as that, the rate of taxes on profits of companies went from 50% (in 1985) to 16% at the moment, which has magnified the snowball effect : companies are reinvesting their profits which later allows them to improve their turnover, creating employment, demand for goods and profits for the years after.

These liberal solutions are simple and efficient. The rate of unemployment dropped from 16,8% in 1985 to 4,6% of the active population, which means that there are shortages of workers in certain fields. Immigration from Eastern Europe and Asia (for less qualified jobs) and Western Europe (for specialist in new technologies) is now necessary. Prosperity is wide-spread, requests for welfare are marginal, and the sums given out are generous : welfare went from 6,000 $ in the 80s for unemployed people to $11,500 now. Liberal capitalism has brought prosperity to everyone : it’s the most social system !

The state functions at its best (according to the Armey curve) when it meets its obligations and when it provides indispensable social aid when necessary. Since social security contributions are low (34%) - inferior to those of the United States (35,6%) - the revenues of the State ae high, as the Laffer curve would indicate. Thus  the budget is in surplus to the tune of (0,9%), a far cry from French and German deficits. The logical consequence of this fiscal policy is that the public debt has dropped from 111% in 1985 to 30,5% of GDP at the moment!

The Irish are the first to benefit from this economic policy : GDP per inhabitant was  36,500 Euros in 2004, or 33% higher than the average for the 25 members of the EU (26510 Euros for France), because growth has reached its optimum potential (5,6% with a population increase of 1,6%, and gains in productivity of 4% a year (higher than the world average : 2,5%). The level of productivity in Ireland was 35% lower than the European average  when the country came into the Union in 1973, and is now 31% higher. This performance has been achieved by systematically allowing the least competitive companies to disappear over the last 20 years. This is Schumpeter’s principle of creative destruction at work : the old docklands of Dublin were torn down and cranes were installed, buildings put up in which hundreds of people work in high productivity jobs.

Advantageous working conditions in Ireland draw a quarter of direct investments in Europe.  The trade balance was positive to the tune of 35,7 billion Euros in 2004 for a GDP of 146 billion Euros. France’s trade balance is in deficit by 24 billion Euros (for a GDP of 1 648 billion) for the first 11 months of 2005! The Irish have clearly understood that opening to the outside could bring them prosperity with globalisation.

In 20 years, the Republic of Ireland has been transformed from that of a poor, heavily indebted country to that of a rich, prosperous country by carefully applying liberal capitalist theories. The 4 million inhabitants work normally in this framework...  The only riches are people, said Jean Bodin.

The tiny Liberal Party created in particular by Mary Harney (who is Minister of Health at the moment) has played a central role in this success story. Its members worked out how to get liberal measures adopted by the majority Conservative Party, even when it was aligned with the Socialist Party (in the equivalent of a grand coalition in the German style).  As soon as i was created in 1985, the Irish economy took off because of these reforms, and it hasn’t stopped yet...

This success was possible because the irish have a good general knowledge of Economy and Finance. There are business economists in Ireland such as Dermot McAleese, Dean of the Faculty of Economics of Trinity College, the main University in Dublin. Dermot McAleese is the author of a major reference work : Economics for Business. He also played an essential role in the recovery of Ireland. Normal liberal economic theories - those which allow the economy to develop : Economics for Business - are taught at the highest levels and are transmitted to the whole population through the education system and the media.

The lowering of tax and social security deductions to 19% on the cost of work has played an essential role. With 80% of their revenues available, the Irish can choose the best health insurance schemes and the best performing pension funds, which bring them the highest revenues for their retirement. They know very well that solutions proposed by the state or the public service are much less efficient. The ugly little lame duck that was Ireland before 1985 has been transformed in a few years into an over-performing Celtic tiger by means of the business economy and a low level of taxation.

Those who are hostile to liberal capitalism always criticise the success of Ireland. At first, they attributed the taking off of the country to the low level of salaries. This argument no longer holds, and if it were ever true, the Greeks would now have the highest standard of living in Europe ! Then, the Irish are accused of having shamefully profited from European subsidies. Ireland received 56 billion Euros starting in 1973 when it became a member of the European Union, which is less than 44 Euros per inhabitant... very little. The rich Irish receive subsidies paid for by taxpayers who are poorer than they are, which only goes to show .. the absurdity of European policy. Finally, between 2001 and 2002, its critics predicted the end of the Irish success story with the decline of the United States. Here too, they are grossly mistaken : growth of GDP continues at round 5% .

Many of the ideas and statistics presented here are taken from a remarkable study carried out by the Belgian economists Paul Vreymans et Eric Verhulst . They were published in a book called Causes of Growth Differentials in Europe.  Extracts of the book can be read (in French) on the site  Work for all which in particular presents the charts showing  that it was the creation of this tiny Liberal Party in 1985 which threw Ireland into a new world, that of  the success of a very liberal economy.

Short version (in French) adapted to France.

Other sources : statistics of the OECD of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, and Wikipedia.

The greatest worldwide success story of an Irishman in the cultural domain is surely that of the group U2 which has never requested subsidies, but which has brought in revenue to the state in the form of taxes. This has not stopped Bono from campaigning against classical liberal capitalism.